Peer review blog

Today was our peer review. We were assigned to a very nice and hard-working group. They were very easy going when we viewed their film. The transfers of film were very smooth too. One thing I really liked about their film was, their camera work was very good. They executed almost all of their shots perfectly. They also had almost all of the requirements. They were only missing two types of shots. Another thing about their film is, they used certain shots at the best moments. For example, they used an establishing shot perfectly, showing the certain house they were using in their film.
One suggestion I would like to make to the people I’m peer reviewing is, their sound. They had no non-diagenetic sound in their film. I believe that they should add some music in the background or any type of soft sound. The biggest thing I would say is that throughout their film the sound is not even. It sounds like many different things are going on in the background. When the film first starts you can hear wind blowing and other sounds that shouldn’t be in it. They did have a diegetic sound in their film which is very good. Also they need to even out the sounds. Although they did use the diegetic sounds, it would be very loud or very low which seem to not fit in the film. Other than that I would say that their film was wonderful, and was very close to being done.